<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Identity Theft Expert?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sileo.com/identity-theft-expert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sileo.com/identity-theft-expert/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=identity-theft-expert</link>
	<description>Identity Theft, Data Breach, Privacy, Trust, Business Survival</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:51:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sotolo</title>
		<link>http://www.sileo.com/identity-theft-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-1253</link>
		<dc:creator>Sotolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 07:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sileo.com/?p=24#comment-1253</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still learning from you, while I&#039;m making my way to the top as well. I absolutely enjoy reading all that is written on your website.Keep the aarticles coming. I liked it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still learning from you, while I&#8217;m making my way to the top as well. I absolutely enjoy reading all that is written on your website.Keep the aarticles coming. I liked it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.sileo.com/identity-theft-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sileo.com/?p=24#comment-56</guid>
		<description>My definition of expert?  Doing it better than 99% of your field.

Not necessarily the best, they have contests and tournaments for that.  Whether it be sports, science, plumbing, flying airplanes, music, etc., experts are the high water mark in their fields and the ones that the vast majority are below with regard to expertise or ability.

The question then becomes, how did they get there?  Some might have been born with certain abilities. Some probably had exposures, and opportunities that aided in their gift or talent.  Some, through drive and determination, achieved their success and abilities, picking themselves up and trying again and again until they surpassed the rest. Some, the true geniuses and top echelon of experts in their fields, probably had a little bit of everything. Thomas Edison, when talking about the invention of the light bulb and how many tries it took until he got it right said, “I didn’t fail, I just found the 10000 things that didn’t work.” Drive, determination, and ability all coupled to put him at the &quot;top&quot; and an expert in design and science.

What keeps you there?  That&#039;s up to the individual.  In medicine, music, aviation, whatever the topic, professional pride and willingness not to rest on ones previous success&#039; has everything to do with maintaining where you are in your field. Not wanting to &quot;mail it in&quot; and continue to push yourself.  To not only exist but to continue to excel is the mark of an expert.  It&#039;s not enough to pass the bar exam, finish med school, earn the MBA or get the dream job you&#039;ve always wanted.  What are you prepared to do to stay at the top?  How much do you want to dig?  That is where experts separate themselves and make the rest of the field &quot;also rans&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My definition of expert?  Doing it better than 99% of your field.</p>
<p>Not necessarily the best, they have contests and tournaments for that.  Whether it be sports, science, plumbing, flying airplanes, music, etc., experts are the high water mark in their fields and the ones that the vast majority are below with regard to expertise or ability.</p>
<p>The question then becomes, how did they get there?  Some might have been born with certain abilities. Some probably had exposures, and opportunities that aided in their gift or talent.  Some, through drive and determination, achieved their success and abilities, picking themselves up and trying again and again until they surpassed the rest. Some, the true geniuses and top echelon of experts in their fields, probably had a little bit of everything. Thomas Edison, when talking about the invention of the light bulb and how many tries it took until he got it right said, “I didn’t fail, I just found the 10000 things that didn’t work.” Drive, determination, and ability all coupled to put him at the &#8220;top&#8221; and an expert in design and science.</p>
<p>What keeps you there?  That&#8217;s up to the individual.  In medicine, music, aviation, whatever the topic, professional pride and willingness not to rest on ones previous success&#8217; has everything to do with maintaining where you are in your field. Not wanting to &#8220;mail it in&#8221; and continue to push yourself.  To not only exist but to continue to excel is the mark of an expert.  It&#8217;s not enough to pass the bar exam, finish med school, earn the MBA or get the dream job you&#8217;ve always wanted.  What are you prepared to do to stay at the top?  How much do you want to dig?  That is where experts separate themselves and make the rest of the field &#8220;also rans&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://www.sileo.com/identity-theft-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sileo.com/?p=24#comment-55</guid>
		<description>What is an expert? Well..I think an expert is constantly evolving and &#039;becoming.&#039; One does not arrive at a point where they know all there is to know.

One only becomes an expert by &quot;being&quot;. Becoming an expert is a process..and I think sometimes its a learning process through a bunch of failures or hardships that bring about expertise. You truly come to know something once you have dealt with a darker side.

I also think that becoming an expert means listening to that small still voice deep within. It&#039;s listening to your heart when everyone else says to do otherwise. It&#039;s going with instinct and a gut feeling because you care.  I don&#039;t think you can become an expert without throwing your heart into something and caring about it. I consider someone an expert when they have made it through the trenches and come out on top.

And I also think that being an expert means being extraordinarily ordinary.

Knowing what you know for the sake of knowing it..not for the sake of celebrity.

I hope this makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is an expert? Well..I think an expert is constantly evolving and &#8216;becoming.&#8217; One does not arrive at a point where they know all there is to know.</p>
<p>One only becomes an expert by &#8220;being&#8221;. Becoming an expert is a process..and I think sometimes its a learning process through a bunch of failures or hardships that bring about expertise. You truly come to know something once you have dealt with a darker side.</p>
<p>I also think that becoming an expert means listening to that small still voice deep within. It&#8217;s listening to your heart when everyone else says to do otherwise. It&#8217;s going with instinct and a gut feeling because you care.  I don&#8217;t think you can become an expert without throwing your heart into something and caring about it. I consider someone an expert when they have made it through the trenches and come out on top.</p>
<p>And I also think that being an expert means being extraordinarily ordinary.</p>
<p>Knowing what you know for the sake of knowing it..not for the sake of celebrity.</p>
<p>I hope this makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne Vaughan</title>
		<link>http://www.sileo.com/identity-theft-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne Vaughan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sileo.com/?p=24#comment-54</guid>
		<description>You asked, &quot;Is it in our genes to be an expert?&quot;  Is is a personality trait, result of hard work, or focus?  Great questions!  I don&#039;t think it is in our genes or a personality trait that makes us an expert in something.  I believe it is the desire to become accomplished at something, the hard work to see it to fruition, the strength of character, the committment of time and energy, and the courage to never give up that puts us in the running to develop expertise.

My second son was gifted.  I knew it, the schools knew it, and he knew it.  When he was in the 8th grade his teachers encouraged him to take the ACT test for college entrance that most kids take when they are juniors in high school.  He took the test and scored higher than 60% of the nation&#039;s juniors and seniors.  He was offered a scholarship at that time to attend Denver University and skip high school.  As his average (not gifted) parent, I felt he needed the high school experience for not only education but social reasons.  He graduated at the top of his class.  He received a nomination to West Point.  He turned it down and took a full ride Air Force ROTC scholarship to the University of Colorado to persue Electrical Engineering.  I watched him struggle in college.  For the first time he had competition.  He wasn&#039;t committed to hard work, as he had never had to work hard to get good grades before.  He assumed college would be easy as most things had been for him up to that time.  It wasn&#039;t.  He refused to dedicate himself to an appropriate study regimen.  He ended up losing his full ride scholarship by one tenth of a percentage point.  Why?  Not because he was not smart, but because he was unable to work hard, commit himself to the time and energy it would take to be successful, and was choosing not to focus on what was most important.  Here was a kid with the brains to do anything and was unable to succeed in developing the knowledge, skill, and committment to achieve a level of expertise in his chosen field.

I don&#039;t believe becoming an expert has much to do with genetic makeup.  I believe it has a lot to do with motivation.  When we want something and want it desparately, we will work hard, study, spend endless hours developing skills, focus on our goals, and never give up. And then our expertise continues to grow as a function of time and experience.  Then and only then will we reach a level of expertise that by some would qualify us to be called an expert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You asked, &#8220;Is it in our genes to be an expert?&#8221;  Is is a personality trait, result of hard work, or focus?  Great questions!  I don&#8217;t think it is in our genes or a personality trait that makes us an expert in something.  I believe it is the desire to become accomplished at something, the hard work to see it to fruition, the strength of character, the committment of time and energy, and the courage to never give up that puts us in the running to develop expertise.</p>
<p>My second son was gifted.  I knew it, the schools knew it, and he knew it.  When he was in the 8th grade his teachers encouraged him to take the ACT test for college entrance that most kids take when they are juniors in high school.  He took the test and scored higher than 60% of the nation&#8217;s juniors and seniors.  He was offered a scholarship at that time to attend Denver University and skip high school.  As his average (not gifted) parent, I felt he needed the high school experience for not only education but social reasons.  He graduated at the top of his class.  He received a nomination to West Point.  He turned it down and took a full ride Air Force ROTC scholarship to the University of Colorado to persue Electrical Engineering.  I watched him struggle in college.  For the first time he had competition.  He wasn&#8217;t committed to hard work, as he had never had to work hard to get good grades before.  He assumed college would be easy as most things had been for him up to that time.  It wasn&#8217;t.  He refused to dedicate himself to an appropriate study regimen.  He ended up losing his full ride scholarship by one tenth of a percentage point.  Why?  Not because he was not smart, but because he was unable to work hard, commit himself to the time and energy it would take to be successful, and was choosing not to focus on what was most important.  Here was a kid with the brains to do anything and was unable to succeed in developing the knowledge, skill, and committment to achieve a level of expertise in his chosen field.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe becoming an expert has much to do with genetic makeup.  I believe it has a lot to do with motivation.  When we want something and want it desparately, we will work hard, study, spend endless hours developing skills, focus on our goals, and never give up. And then our expertise continues to grow as a function of time and experience.  Then and only then will we reach a level of expertise that by some would qualify us to be called an expert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barb</title>
		<link>http://www.sileo.com/identity-theft-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Barb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sileo.com/?p=24#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Now that&#039;s a very intriguing question and I&#039;ve often wondered it myself because I like the idea of being an expert in something. I think one of the vital traits needed to become an expert is drive, desire, tenacity, single-mindedness, focus - whatever you want to call it - that compels you to study, learn, practice, publish, listen and stay current on your specific topic until you know more than most of the population knowledgeable about the topic.   More ?’s:  Is “expert” always a relative term? Are most experts driven in many areas of their lives or just in their area of expertise?  Must you be a disseminator of your expertise in order to be an expert or can you just ?  I don’t think I agree with Mark Sanborn that it takes 10 – 15 years to become and expert.  I think it has to be variable depending on your commitment, availability of information, time dedicated, etc. – and once you’re an expert doesn’t mean it lasts forever.  It’s an ongoing process.  And though I like the idea of being an expert, I’m a “generalist” – know a little about a variety of topics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that&#8217;s a very intriguing question and I&#8217;ve often wondered it myself because I like the idea of being an expert in something. I think one of the vital traits needed to become an expert is drive, desire, tenacity, single-mindedness, focus &#8211; whatever you want to call it &#8211; that compels you to study, learn, practice, publish, listen and stay current on your specific topic until you know more than most of the population knowledgeable about the topic.   More ?’s:  Is “expert” always a relative term? Are most experts driven in many areas of their lives or just in their area of expertise?  Must you be a disseminator of your expertise in order to be an expert or can you just ?  I don’t think I agree with Mark Sanborn that it takes 10 – 15 years to become and expert.  I think it has to be variable depending on your commitment, availability of information, time dedicated, etc. – and once you’re an expert doesn’t mean it lasts forever.  It’s an ongoing process.  And though I like the idea of being an expert, I’m a “generalist” – know a little about a variety of topics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colleen Stanley</title>
		<link>http://www.sileo.com/identity-theft-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Colleen Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sileo.com/?p=24#comment-52</guid>
		<description>My first qualifier or disqualifier on an expert is finding out whether they have “been there and done it.”  I have found in field of expertise, sales and sales management training, that many of the trainers are teaching out of a book.  They have never been charged with a quota, never actually managed a team or been responsible for true P &amp; L responsibilities.  The second qualifier is whether or not the person can share their expertise in a manner where people actually learn and/or change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first qualifier or disqualifier on an expert is finding out whether they have “been there and done it.”  I have found in field of expertise, sales and sales management training, that many of the trainers are teaching out of a book.  They have never been charged with a quota, never actually managed a team or been responsible for true P &amp; L responsibilities.  The second qualifier is whether or not the person can share their expertise in a manner where people actually learn and/or change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Wallin</title>
		<link>http://www.sileo.com/identity-theft-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Wallin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sileo.com/?p=24#comment-51</guid>
		<description>In a recent documentary Eric Clapton, who most would agree is an expert guitarist, confessed that he found it impossible to accurately play some songs written by blues legend Robert Johnson. During an interview Mr. Clapton said, &quot;I am able to approximate Robert Johnson&#039;s skill level but I&#039;m not good enough to duplicate it.&quot; I am of the belief that whether or not someone is an &quot;expert&quot; depends upon who is calling them an expert and by what measure the determination is being made. In some circles, I am known as a sales expert. I have achieved personal and professional success practicing the craft of selling and I have had the pleasure of helping hundreds of sales professionals in dozens of global corporations improve their own sales performance. Am I a sales expert? Depends on who you ask.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent documentary Eric Clapton, who most would agree is an expert guitarist, confessed that he found it impossible to accurately play some songs written by blues legend Robert Johnson. During an interview Mr. Clapton said, &#8220;I am able to approximate Robert Johnson&#8217;s skill level but I&#8217;m not good enough to duplicate it.&#8221; I am of the belief that whether or not someone is an &#8220;expert&#8221; depends upon who is calling them an expert and by what measure the determination is being made. In some circles, I am known as a sales expert. I have achieved personal and professional success practicing the craft of selling and I have had the pleasure of helping hundreds of sales professionals in dozens of global corporations improve their own sales performance. Am I a sales expert? Depends on who you ask.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Montgomery</title>
		<link>http://www.sileo.com/identity-theft-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Montgomery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 04:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sileo.com/?p=24#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Well, it seems to me, as a total clod, that expertise is over rated.

That&#039;s a joke, people.

A good friend told me years ago that &quot;if you read 7 books about any topic&quot; you&#039;re an expert.  In some ways it&#039;s totally true.  I remember in college studying health care politics for an entire semester.  I undoubtedly had read more about the topic than 98% of our Congressmen and Senators, and it was clear that I was NOT an expert.  Yet we considered them to be experts.

My point?   Not sure, but I can tell ya I loved your post.  Keep up the good work, mr. expert!

Brad Montgomery</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it seems to me, as a total clod, that expertise is over rated.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a joke, people.</p>
<p>A good friend told me years ago that &#8220;if you read 7 books about any topic&#8221; you&#8217;re an expert.  In some ways it&#8217;s totally true.  I remember in college studying health care politics for an entire semester.  I undoubtedly had read more about the topic than 98% of our Congressmen and Senators, and it was clear that I was NOT an expert.  Yet we considered them to be experts.</p>
<p>My point?   Not sure, but I can tell ya I loved your post.  Keep up the good work, mr. expert!</p>
<p>Brad Montgomery</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christie Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.sileo.com/identity-theft-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Christie Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 01:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sileo.com/?p=24#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I am constantly intrigued by the notion that true
talents cannot be taught.  They are behaviors,
actions and even attitudes that we consistently use
and that get consistent results.   It is what comes
naturally to us.  Knowledge and skill, on the other
hand are learned.  We sharpen them like a knife with
repetition and practice.
I&#039;m not sure a person can have expertise without
all three of these: talent, knowledge and skill.
You can learn what you need to (skill), study what
you need to (knowledge), but still not hit a ball
like Tiger.  Tiger has talent.  That gives him
expertise without question.
And I&#039;m quite sure Tiger doesn&#039;t have to .
for us.

optimize his website for key words.  Many people
pop up like an expert that way.  He simply is one.
It would benefit all of us to focus on our true
talents to uncover our expertise, instead of
&quot;decide&quot; we&#039;re going to be an expert on something.
Thanks, John, for posing the question.  A few of us
will be tracking you for the results!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am constantly intrigued by the notion that true<br />
talents cannot be taught.  They are behaviors,<br />
actions and even attitudes that we consistently use<br />
and that get consistent results.   It is what comes<br />
naturally to us.  Knowledge and skill, on the other<br />
hand are learned.  We sharpen them like a knife with<br />
repetition and practice.<br />
I&#8217;m not sure a person can have expertise without<br />
all three of these: talent, knowledge and skill.<br />
You can learn what you need to (skill), study what<br />
you need to (knowledge), but still not hit a ball<br />
like Tiger.  Tiger has talent.  That gives him<br />
expertise without question.<br />
And I&#8217;m quite sure Tiger doesn&#8217;t have to .<br />
for us.</p>
<p>optimize his website for key words.  Many people<br />
pop up like an expert that way.  He simply is one.<br />
It would benefit all of us to focus on our true<br />
talents to uncover our expertise, instead of<br />
&#8220;decide&#8221; we&#8217;re going to be an expert on something.<br />
Thanks, John, for posing the question.  A few of us<br />
will be tracking you for the results!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Sanborn</title>
		<link>http://www.sileo.com/identity-theft-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sanborn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sileo.com/?p=24#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Since I made expertise part of my theme during the year I served as NSA (National Speakers Association) president, I spent a considerable amount of time studying and thinking about expertise. My conclusion is that expertise is primarily developed and proven by these components: experience, education/study, teaching (others), research (primary and secondary) and innovation (adding something new to your field of expertise). Far more people posture as experts than can actually be considered true experts. A new book just out from Random House talks about this in part (based on reviews; I&#039;ve not had a chance to read), The Cult of the Amateur by Andrew Keen. He talks about the internet creating faux experts; opinions, often incorrect, have taken on credibility through mass dissemination. The research, by the way, is clear: expertise almost always takes 10-15 years to develop. Instant expertise is really a myth. You can quickly gain more expertise than you had, but it doesn&#039;t make you an expert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I made expertise part of my theme during the year I served as NSA (National Speakers Association) president, I spent a considerable amount of time studying and thinking about expertise. My conclusion is that expertise is primarily developed and proven by these components: experience, education/study, teaching (others), research (primary and secondary) and innovation (adding something new to your field of expertise). Far more people posture as experts than can actually be considered true experts. A new book just out from Random House talks about this in part (based on reviews; I&#8217;ve not had a chance to read), The Cult of the Amateur by Andrew Keen. He talks about the internet creating faux experts; opinions, often incorrect, have taken on credibility through mass dissemination. The research, by the way, is clear: expertise almost always takes 10-15 years to develop. Instant expertise is really a myth. You can quickly gain more expertise than you had, but it doesn&#8217;t make you an expert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
